US troops 'Won't Attend Inquests'

news.bbc.co.uk

The MoD has sent written guidance to coroners across England and Wales over the holding of military inquests. According to the Times, its letter says the US "confirms categorically" it will not provide witnesses for inquests. It comes six days after three British soldiers were killed by US "friendly fire" in southern Afghanistan. The Times reports that the letter to coroners states: "The US have confirmed categorically that they will not provide witnesses to attend UK inquests. "While coroners may continue to ask for US witnesses to attend... they should be aware that there will in all cases be a refusal."

Look, I understand that friendly fire is an occupational hazard of military warfare. Nor am I in any way, shape, or form, criticizing our military for having been the cause of friendly fire deaths. However, categorically refusing to provide witnesses is just plain arrogant. For crying out loud, make some agreement to prevent charges in the event of friendly fire deaths and let the witnesses attend the inquests, if it's at all possible.

Because, that's the other point. In most cases, I am pretty sure our military is busy at the moment, and need every member they have out in the field. So, could we maybe have some intelligent (yes, I know. Oxymoron) people actually communicate with our ally, and work at less severe, blunt language?

I'm asking for too much, aren't I?

[sigh]

I know, I know. I'll behave.